or "arche'", of the presentation.


1. For the first step of the presentation, for s = 1, we then have --

R^(2(^1)) = R^2 = R(R) = the [self-[reflexive]]function R "of" R =

"R-squared" = R confronts itself = R evokes its own immanent other /

"intra-dual" out of itself = R "aufheben"-negates itself = R + delta-R =

R + q-sub-rr = q-sub-r + q-sub-rr.

I propose that we interpret the "delta-R", or qrr, term -- corresponding to the "uninterpreted' N\Q "meta-numeral" q1+1 = q2 -- as a term which connotes the result of the "self-reflexion" of "reality".

In this context, that means the immanent emergence, within Nature, from out of Nature -- as part of the dialectic, or self-development, of Nature itself -- of "observing eyes", and of "observing sensoria" in general; of observing and thinking minds, as "things"/objects/bodies within Nature -- the emergence of Natural entities which produce languages, hence "terms", to name/communicate their observations/experiences among themselves. Thus, we are asserting the interpretation, or assignment:

q2 (---] qrr = qt = T.

Accepting this interpretation, we then have that, as of step 1, s = 1, we find that the model r^(2^(s)), posits the possible existence of two philosophical categories -- the category of "reality", "plus" [+] its "contra-thesis" category of "terms", used in "naming" the "elements" of that "reality":

R^(2(^1)) = R^2 = R + T.